天津科技

天津科技 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (05): 84-87.

• 科技编辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

地学科技期刊退稿原因分类剖析及写作建议——以《地理与地理信息科学》为例

闫爽1, 寇晓康2,3,4   

  1. 1.河北省科学院地理科学研究所,河北省地理信息开发应用技术创新中心 河北石家庄 050011;
    2.石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院 河北石家庄 050043;
    3.道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室（石家庄铁道大学） 河北石家庄 050043;
    4.中核三维地理信息工程技术研究中心 河北石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-09 发布日期:2026-01-05

Classification and analysis of reasons for rejections in geoscience technology journals and writing suggestions：taking Geography and Geo-information Science as an example

YAN Shuang1, KOU Xiaokang2,3,4   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographical Sciences,Hebei Academy of Sciences,Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Geographic Information Application,Shijiazhuang 050011,China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering,Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043,China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control <Shijiazhuang Tiedao University>,Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang 050043,China;
    4. CNNC Engineering Research Center of 3D Geographic Information,050043,Shijiazhuang 050043,China
  • Received:2025-04-09 Published:2026-01-05

摘要： 以地学科技期刊《地理与地理信息科学》为例,将退稿文章的作者划分为本科生、硕士研究生、博士研究生和青年学者等不同类型,对不同类型作者的退稿原因与写作问题进行分析。研究发现：从作者类型看,被退稿件中本科生论文占比最低（1.17%）,硕士研究生占比最高（35.82%）,博士研究生、青年学者及其他居中;从学生和教师的退稿率看,二者分别为62.08%和37.92%,学生撰写论文的退稿率明显高于教师;从退稿阶段看,初审阶段退稿率最高,达91.48%,其次为专家外审、主编终审阶段。学生和教师两类人群退稿的共性原因包括伪创新性、论文结构不完整、研究时效性不强、评价指标选取不当、研究深度不足等;对于个性原因,学生在于缺乏对相关研究的调研、撰写格式混乱,教师在于论文整体繁复、未能突出重点等。

关键词: 科技期刊, 不同类型作者, 退稿原因, 写作建议

Abstract: Taking the geological science and technology journal Geography and Geo-information Science as an example,the authors of rejected articles are divided into different types such as undergraduate students,master’s students,doctoral students,and young scholars. The reasons for rejection and writing problems of different types of authors are analyzed. The research found that：from the perspective of author types,undergraduates among the rejected manuscripts account for the lowest proportion （1.17%）,master’s students account for the highest proportion （35.82%）,and doctoral students,young scholars,and others are in the middle. From the perspective of the rejection rates of students and teachers,they are 62.08% and 37.92% respectively. The rejection rate of students writing papers is significantly higher than that of teachers. From the perspective of the rejection stage,the rejection rate in the initial review stage is highest,reaching 91.48%,followed by the expert external review stage and the editor in chief final review stage. The common reasons for the rejection of papers among students and teachers include pseudo innovation,incomplete paper structure,weak research timeliness,improper selection of evaluation indicators,and insufficient research depth. From the perspective of individual reasons,students lack research on related topics and have disorganized writing formats,while teachers produce overly complicated papers and fail to highlight key points.

Key words: scientific journals, different types of authors, reason for rejection, writing suggestions

中图分类号: